9780805096170
Henry Holt, 2013
368 pp
this book is an arc:
a big thank you to Christine at Henry Holt for my copy. Also, if you
are interested, a Q&A with the author follows my discussion of this
book.
An intriguing premise, a mystery to be solved and an alternative world are the highpoints of this new science fiction novel; if you're really into genetics and hard science in your fiction, this book may be just up your alley. The book is a mix of alternative history, science fiction, man-on-the-run and mad-scientist stories, all with a little romance thrown in to the mix. It is set in a world like ours except that evolutionists and their theories have been totally shot down & debunked, and the earth has been scientifically proven to be 5800 years old.
In this world lives Paul Carlsson, who has been fascinated with the study of genetics from boyhood on. As an adult, he's taken on by Westing, a research firm that combines two of Paul's passions under the banner of "paleometagenomics," the "intersection" of genetics and anthropology. He is assigned to work on a dig in Indonesia, but the work is shut down after an attack. Paul and two others flee while being shot at. It isn't long until the pursuers catch up to Paul & his friends, killing one, injuring Paul causing him to lose an eye. When Paul finally returns to Westing, he can't help but wonder what was so important about what he'd found at the site; most of the rest of the story concerns his efforts to find out. Trouble is, he can't do it alone, but the people who come to his aid seem to be dying off. The story is told in brief chapters from both Paul's side and from the side of the bad guys so that the reader is not totally in the dark about what's going on.
There are some good things about this novel, but there are also things to watch out for. The premise and setting are appealing, and Paul's attempt to get past all of the roadblocks trying to solve the mystery of what's behind the attack at the dig were attractive to my crime-fiction reader self. However, if you are looking for a big payoff after all of the action, you might be a bit dissatisfied. There are definitely clues throughout the book that point to the big reveal, but overall, it just didn't materialize in the "eye-opening and page-turning read" way Clive Cussler writes about on the cover blurb.The big "climactic" scenes were kind of flat and really failed to grab me. However, multiple 4- and 5-star ratings have been awarded to this book, so it's obvious that a great many readers have really liked it. I was intrigued right up until the end so I can recommend it, with the caveats noted above.
****
Here's a Q&A with the author, Ted Kosamatka, an award-winning writer of science fiction:
Q&A with Ted Kosmatka, author of PROPHET OF BONES
Q.
You are well known in the science-fiction and fantasy genres for your
highly praised short stories and first novel, The Games. What inspired
you to write Prophet of Bones—a thriller?
A. The novel was
actually inspired by a conversation I had with a co-worker about
young-earth creationism. In 2005 the Kansas Board of Education held a
series of hearings in an effort to introduce intelligent design into
science classes in public schools. Statistics show that there are a huge
number of people who believe evolution to be false, and the reality is
that some of those people are in charge of educational policies. I think
I imagined the novel as a way of granting young-earth creationists
their argument. Here is a universe where the earth truly is
young—provably, verifiably, by carbon 14 dating. But nothing else is
different. The fossil record of the novel is identical to our fossil
record, only now these bones must be faced within the context of a
creationist world. It’s another window into the argument, and presents a
case, I think, that a young earth would present a far more disturbing
picture than the world we actually inhabit.
Q. Prophet of
Bones is an extension of your widely acclaimed short story “The Prophet
of Flores,” which has been printed in several year’s best
science-fiction and fantasy collections and translated into several
languages. Why do you think it struck such a chord with this audience?
What was the motivation for expanding the story?
A. I
honestly try not to think too much about what an audience might do with a
story I write. It’s nice when a story gets good reviews or a positive
response, sure, but the best writing always comes from a place of
humility, and the last thing you want to ask yourself while writing is,
Will people like this? I’m very much from the
story-belongs-to-the-reader camp. It's totally up to the audience how to
interpret a story, and the writer doesn't have any control over that.
My main motivation for going back and expanding from the original
premise was that I wanted to know what happened next. My mind kept
returning to it again and again, and at some point I realized that I had
a lot more I wanted to explore.
Q. How did you prepare to write Prophet of Bones? What kind of research was involved?
A.
I think my whole life was a kind of research for this book. I studied
biology in college and have always read everything I could get my hands
on—from scientific journals to scholarly tomes on human variation. I
went to Catholic school growing up, but at the same time I was always
very interested in science and evolution and genetics, so I had these
two very powerful and contradictory dogmas competing for my attention
and loyalty—or at least that’s how I felt at the time. I’m much less
conflicted about it now, but I suppose it made an impact on me. Science
and religion both seek the answer to similar queries: Why are we here?
How did we get here? And these are questions I was particularly
interested in for some reason. I was bombarded with these two very
different perspectives, and most of my early experiences as a child
trying to understand my place in the world were colored by the tension
between these different worldviews.
Q. The book is
grounded, in part, by real science. Can you share some of the most
important scientific foundations that were critical to your research?
A.
Well, the most important bit of science critical to the story, of
course, was the discovery of those strange fossils on the island of
Flores. Without that discovery, I doubt I would have had a way to tell
this kind of story. The science of genetics also plays an important part
in the novel. As much as possible I tried to use real science in the
story, though truthfully the genomics revolution we’re undergoing right
now reads a lot like science fiction. Many of the great anthropological
questions of my childhood are now being answered in no uncertain terms
by genetics. It’s absolutely astounding what we’re able to learn from
just a small bit of DNA.
Q. In 2003, Mike Morwood actually
discovered a human-like species known as “the Hobbit” on the island of
Flores. This find plays a key role in the plot of Prophet of Bones,
which is set in an alternate world where Darwin is discredited and the
earth is known to be only 5,800 years old. Why did you choose write the
tale as a twist on the truth?
A. Twists on the truth always
make the best stories, I think. I’ve always been drawn to intractable
scientific arguments, and at the time when I first came up with the idea
for the book, there was a lot of fighting about what this particular
fossil might mean. There was one camp that felt the fossil was just a
pathological human and another camp that felt it was something far
different. To some extent, I think, that argument is still going on,
though evidence has certainly mounted in favor of one particular
interpretation. I use a lot of my stories as a way for me to think about
problems I’m interested in; and to a lot of people in anthropology,
these fossils present themselves as one of the most unexpected and
fascinating problems to have burst on the scene in a very long time.
Also, as an outlier in the cannon of archaeological finds, the Flores
fossils were a great tool for investigating what it truly means to be
human.
Q. Your résumé includes a wide array of jobs:
fast-food worker, housepainter, security guard, college tutor,
zookeeper, laboratory analyst, endangered-species researcher, stage
actor, and video-game writer. How did working in such varied
environments help you write this novel?
A. I think for a
writer, anything that broadens your experience can only be a good thing
if your goal is to understand the world. Doing a bunch of different jobs
over the years is certainly one way to gain a lot of different
experiences. (It also could mean you’re just not very good at anything,
so it is by no means always a mark of distinction.) I’ve always been
experience-hungry, so that might have played some part in my work
history, though it’s hard to say. I’ve been very lucky in that I’ve been
able to work in the fields I’ve been interested in. This novel probably
draws most directly from my experience working in a research lab, and
possibly a bit from my time as a zookeeper. They say that you should
write what you know, so it was nice to have actually worked in the kinds
of places I’m writing about.
Q. You currently work as a
writer at Valve, which is home to some of the world's most popular video
games, including Half-Life, Portal, Dota 2, Left 4 Dead and
Counter-Strike. How is writing for a digital medium different than
writing for a printed medium?
A. Writing for a digital
medium above all else requires flexibility. The job can change a lot
from week to week, depending on what you're working on. You get pulled
in new directions all the time. In writing print fiction, you are the
master of everything that happens in your story, but in writing for
video games, you are a part of this large collaborative process. You
have lots of really smart people to lean on and bounce ideas off of,
which is awesome, and the process is in some ways very democratic. Your
ideas
have to win people over. The best ideas tend to win out in
the long run, and then you go out as a team and institute those ideas.
Q.
The main character in Prophet of Bones, Paul Carlsson, is a scientist.
You studied biology at Indiana University and went on to work as a lab
technician. You also bred mice in your basement as a young boy,
something Paul does in the book. How did your own life inspire Paul’s
character?
A. I think I’m very much like Paul in a lot of
ways. We’re interested in the same questions, and driven by many of the
same motivations. I suppose we have a lot of the same fears and
insecurities. But for him, it is all experienced through the lens of
life lived in a creationist universe, whereas I live in one more
consistent with evolution. So while we’re interested in the same
questions, the answers will be very different.
Q. You already have another book in the works. Can you give us any hints as to what it’s about?
A.
Well, I haven’t pinned down a title yet, but the book will be a
continuation of my early novelette “Divining Light,” which was nominated
for a Nebula Award in 2010. It’s another lab-opera, and I’m beginning
to sense a trend in my fiction. Stephen King writes about writers in
trouble, and John Grisham writes about lawyers in trouble. I seem to
write about scientists in trouble. So this will be my third novel
centered on laboratories. And again, it’s me being drawn to another
intractable scientific problem, in this case, the famous two-slit
experiment. It’s a story about quantum mechanics, and in it, a
researcher discovers that reality is not exactly what it seems to be.
Life hangs in the balance.